Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Cyril Buck ..Febuary 29th 1924- July 20th 2012
.Cyril was born in Paddington ,London,U.K. on February 29th 1924 and died a long way from his birthplace, in Newmarket, Ontario, on Friday at 3. o'clock in the afternoon.
He lived eighty-eight years ,was married to Evelyn sixty-two years , had seven children, two daughters, five sons, seventeen grandchildren, four great-grandchildren and two more on the way at the time he took his leave.
Art, Music and Theatre were the passions of his life. He trod the boards in amateur theatre in London,England before leaving for Canada and soon after arrival discovered new opportunity with Theatre Aurora.
Twenty years of his retirement were happily and completely engaged filling every conceivable role needed to make the magic come alive/.
Sons, daughters, and grandchildren were recruited to fill roles, places in the chorus or silently change sets before there were curtains for the stage.
He introduced English Variety Theatre.
Christmas found him at Newmarket Town Hall Theatre, with the Queensville Players, staging Pantomine, with a bunch of Limeys like himself who could never let go their joy and love of slapstick comedy.
If he wasn't on stage playing an Ugly Sister, he was in the orchestra pit providing clicks, clacks, thumps and rattity- tatts on drums, his secondary means of augmenting a living over the years.
Dozens of full house audiences and hundreds of Canadian children,
including his grandchildren, might never have had the opportunity to enjoy the entertainment the unique brand of British farce offers.
He worked with Terry Hallett, a talented Aurora Producer and Director, in Dinner Theatre in Toronto during the eighties.
The tide recedes but leaves behind
Bright seashells in the sand
The sun goes down but gentle warmth
Still lingers on the land
The music stops and yet
It echoes on in sweet refrain,
For every joy that passes
Something beautiful remains.
Posted by Evelyn Buck at 12:33 PM 0 comments
Sunday, July 15, 2012
The :Last Of The Mohicans
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "New
Information":
Back to basics. This all began when Evelyn asked about
construction in her neighbourhood. The mayor said the new system would provide
the answer if she asked the top guy. I assume she asked the question. Was it
answered and, if not, what does the Mayor have to say about it ? If the system
answered the question, we are wasting time here. Cut all the tech stuff. Back to
basics. Was the construction explained?
************
I posed the possibility the new system might provide details of
the work order which would allow me to explain the nature of the problem and the number of workers engaged, man hours employed, separate pieces of equipment, cost per hour exactly to the penny how much the job cost to my observant neighbor.
The Mayor agreed the system would provide the information.
Indicating he had the same understanding of implementation as myself.
We were both mistaken it seems. .The software is not yet implemented.
I did not receive details of cost of the work order on my neighbour's property.
The situation led to inquiries in two new directions.
One, to determine from my neighbor, what experience led to the call to the works department.
Last Fall a subsidence was noticed in the vicinity of the water shut-off valve on the front lawn.
It was checked by the works dept and went on a list of things to do
In Spring, after several more calls, the works department came to attend to the problem in accordance with its place on the list
A strip of lawn about a meter wide and two long was carefully cut and rolled back.
An excavation followed. A water pipe was inadvertently ruptured and had to be repaired. The excavation was filled,sod replaced . and a fresh crew brought in to water the grass.
Information I received from the Director revealed the project involved several crews with different expertise.It did not reveal the source of the initial problem of lawn subsidence.
Lay person that I am, it has always been my understanding if the ground subsides, whether it is in a road or a lawn in the vicinity of water infrastructure, the likely cause is a water break.
The unanswered question is whether a water break caused the lawn to subside in the Fall, which meant a continuing water loss in that location over a period of months?
Or, less likely, was the pipe broken at the time of the excavation immediately repaired and no water lost to speak of or record in
maintenance of assets and how the matter was handled.
My second question was the status of the software program to record asset inventory and track maintenance.
At this point I had still not caught on to the name, Maximo.
My first query was by e-mail to the manager of the IT department. I received a response from the Director of FInance with admonition not to ask questions of staff under the level of Director. Attached was the e-mail from the IT Manager, accompanied by my query and assurance to the Chief Financial Officer the manager had provided no information.
The Director of Finance informed me of the associated Director in charge of the program. He added it is not yet implemented. It is complex and is to be done in two phases.
The Director in charge noted a delay in the schedule caused by a production problem in Asia.
I received a table. I posted it a couple of days ago, outlining
the program, total cost and the timetable. Total anticipated cost is $788,611. Software package approved for purchase in November 2011. $38,000 was overlooked and added on in February.2012.
I received information from a source that the Region had purchased the same software.in 2004, eight years ago. and after add ons and adpatations and staff changes were still not receiving the benefits
expected.
From two regional staff I received two perspectives. One
stated the prorgam was finally beginning to show some benefits.
Another, the manager dealing with the program was more positive but acknowledged there had to be adaptations in nodules and staff and licences required to use the system had gone from $56,000. to $100,000 a year because more employees were using the program.
That means, additional staff, additonal adaptation costing more money, and additional cost of annual licencing , operating costs are, at least, a quarter of a million dollars more than anticipated.
After eight years, adaptations are unlikely to be reflected in the capital cost of the program. More likely to be hidden in annual cost of operation.
I suspect, since the Mayor's expectation of timetable was no different to my own, news about time taken at the region to get this program under way may not be a welcome surprise.
Nor indeed should it have been a surprise at all. The Region's experience should certainly have been reflected in the advice received by Council. It was not.
If the program ever becomes useful at the local level, there will have been an election in town before it can be proven.
That's the political reality. .
Posted by Evelyn Buck at 12:32 PM 0 comments
Saturday, July 14, 2012
A Moving Target
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "So
I asked And GOt The Answer":
7:27 PM You say that Morris is going to
be back in court on Tuesday. I don't understand why. Didn't the Judge throw her
case out as being without foundations or something like that? Surely Aurora is
not still paying her bills - have we ever been told categorically that the town
is off the hook? Nasty feeling about all that stuff. An apology would not cut it
this far along.
***********************
Ms,Morris is being sued for defendants' costs of that particular court action precipitated by herself at town expense while she held the Office of Mayor.
The town is not currently paying those bills.
It remains to be seen if the town is off the hook.
The town agreed to pay bills incurred until the new Council had the opportunity to cancel the legal agreement with the lawyer retained by Ms Morris.
At the moment ,the defendants are attempting to recover legal expense of having to defend themselves against spurious charges.
I didn't hear what happened on Tuesday.
The complainant has proven to be a moving target.
Posted by Evelyn Buck at 10:14 AM 0 comments